Film Noir, and Detective Fiction

All my life I’ve been fascinated with detective fiction.  It seems almost human nature to adhere to the unlawful.  I think that most individuals are spellbound by misdeeds and the felonious.  It intrigues us.  Simplistically put: crime is bad and, if indulged, there are consequences (some more grave then others).  We have the tendency to watch and absorb novels and films that depict crime; it’s an interactive gateway drug that allows people to nearly experience the inexperienceable.

Recently I discovered HBO’sBored to Death.”  What makes the show very appealing, besides the idiosyncratic wit, is the fact that the entire show is founded in classic literature and detective fiction.  Frequent references to Fitzgerald, Hemingway, Raymond Chandler, Dashiell Hammett and countless other authors dot each episode creating a writer’s haven of inside jokes.  Along with the references and humor, resides a wonderful plot, surrounding the inane exploits of an unlicensed, Craigslist detective.  This aspect of the show is just as equally founded in classicism as the literary references; “Bored to Death” continually dives into the deep well of the private eye genre.  From the ‘whodunit’ to the ‘inverted detective story’ tried and true methods of detective writing are revealed and then accented with atypical characters and circumstances.  These elements are then interwoven with the literary, and then once again recombined with a myriad of cliché film noir archetypes that creates a truly enthralling half-hour’s worth of television.

Other programs such as “Bones,” “CSI,” and “Psych” all tweak the police procedural to form a distinctively absorbing television show; however, all of which, are founded within the same genre.  Myself included, humans are rebellious by nature and this is but a small extension of that rebellion.

I started working on my own detective novella several months ago and have yet to make any real progress.  I have a couple of okay ideas, and the framework complete, in a purely outlined form, yet I’ve hit the proverbial stonewall.  I know what I want my characters to do next and I even know what to do with them afterwards, yet I’m unsure how to execute the process.  Even though my writing as well as “Bored to Death” and most Raymond Chandler novels are based in detective fiction, how do I tweak it to make it my own?  How do I take the inherent rebellion expressed through watching crime unfold and then to be solved, and fashion it into something unique?  I believe that some clichés are needed in order to redirect the piece back to its foundation; however, some aspects could easily brush by the ‘paying homage’ intention and graze upon plagiarism.  It is a fine line to straddle, but I think if done correctly I could, just as Raymond Chandler and Dashiell Hammett did all those years ago, write a unique piece of private eye fiction.

There are some truly great films out there that highlight the private eye, but I would like to see a second coming of detective fiction.  I’ve read some contemporary novels that are spot on, but the nostalgia created from picking up a worn pocket-sized paperback and curling up with a great read, a warm cup of coffee, and a fire a blazing is priceless, and unfortunately lost in modern times.

Why can’t we renew this concept, and curl up with a piece of detective fiction digitized for the Kindle or Nook, a warm latte, and an electric fire set aglow?  This is the question that I ask you.

2 thoughts on “Film Noir, and Detective Fiction

Add yours

  1. I do love detective fiction. Ah, Sam Spade and such. 😀 As for writing, I’m a big fan of just writing out the crappy first draft. Be derivative, cliched, etc. Whatever it takes to get it down on the page. You can always rewrite later. Recently, I started seeing my MIP as a series of scenes. Probably obvious to a lot of plotters but it was new to me. I realized that all I had to focus on was each individual scene and not worry about any of the others. Plus, I could move a scene around or change it without as big a deal as if I kept seeing the manuscript as one whole thing. Obviously, all the scenes have to flow together but there’s time for that later.

    1. That’s definitely a great way to look at it and truth be told I usually just sit and type to get the bulk of it out, and then worry about the editing, transitions, word choice, grammar, etc. at a later date I’ve never tried my hand at a screenplay, but every once in awhile I like to indulge myself in a bit of poetry. Akin to just focusing on a single scene at a time I prefer to single out stanzas, and tweak and alter it as I see fit once complete. Also, like you pointed out the scenes (or stanzas in my case) can then be shuffled around and the transitions can be reworked to accommodate the change way more easily then rewriting the entire work.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

Website Powered by

Up ↑

%d bloggers like this: